Connecting PNAC, September 11th
and Katrina’s New Orleans Damage
September
7th 2005
|
 |
|
President Bush in
Biloxi MS |
|
Is it absurd to
suggest that the political disaster that emerged from the aftermath
of Hurricane Katrina can be blamed on the collapse of the Soviet
Union in 1991?
That was the
moment that the United States suddenly became the world’s "sole
remaining superpower", and as such also became, in the minds of many
politicos, the "indispensable nation". Those twin titles became a
mantra for power hungry individuals who lusted to influence
America’s presidency.
Kevin Phillips,
in his book American Dynasty, documents the emergence of that
international power lust during the buildup to the 1990 Iraqi
invasion of Kuwait. On July 24, 1990 Margaret Tutwiler, spokeswoman
for the George H.W. Bush State Department, said, "We do not have any
defense treaties with Kuwait and there are no special defense or
security commitments to Kuwait." The next day, according to
Phillips, April Glaspie, US Ambassador to Iraq, told Saddam Hussein,
"We (the US Government) have no opinion on the Arab-Arab conflicts,
like your border disagreements with Kuwait."
That
pre-invasion ambivalence, however, was transformed into a national
call for America to devote its resources to guarding the world
against the horrors of despotism even while Mikhail Gorbachev’s USSR
was entering its death throes. Eventually the American military led
a coalition of nations to push its former ally in the battle against
the spread Islamic radicalism back within its borders. From the end
of that conflict up to the current occupation the US military
enforced a military blockade against Iraq that prohibited the
exportation of Iraqi oil on the open market, the importation of
basic food and medical supplies except under UN scrutiny, and limits
on the Iraqi government to exercise its authority within its
borders.
Over that same
time and throughout the Clinton Administration, major policy
advisors to the current President Bush, specifically Dick Cheney,
Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, and Lewis Libby,
were busy speculating on America’s role in creating a "New World
Order". Reports Phillips, on page 311 of American Dynasty,
"Their blueprint included a section on realigning the Middle East by
overthrowing Saddam Hussein....When terror struck on 9/11, Rumsfeld
was one of those who wanted to make Iraq an immediate target."
Although the
attacks of 9/11 gave a very public justification for striking at an
enemy, the idea was being formed for a decade. "As the 20th century
draws to a close, the United States stands as the world’s most
preeminent power," so declared a group taking the name Project for
the New American Century (PNAC) in a 1997 document titled,
Rebuilding America’s Defenses (RAD). In it the group,
whose membership reads like the directory for both Bush
Administrations, pondered, "Having led the West to victory in the
Cold War, America faces an opportunity and a challenge: Does the
United States have the vision to build upon the achievement of past
decades? Does the United States have the resolve to shape a new
century favorable to American principles and interests?"
Among the goals
PNAC listed in the RAD were regime changes in Kosovo (which was
initiated on the eve of President Bill Clinton’s January 1999
impeachment vote) and Iraq. These objectives were for the sake of
the "indispensable nation" assuring a "Pax Americana" in which
commerce and wealth would be assured to everyone everywhere all the
time. Working hand-in-hand with the military goals of past and
present Bush Administrations came trade policies that have helped
global corporations find the lowest cost labor market and
distribute the products freely in this country through corporate
retailers. Consequently American labor has gone into wage
competition with workers in undeveloped countries.
Perhaps the
biggest story of the disaster in New Orleans is how it has brought
the nation to suffer the consequences of decisions made through
almost two decades since the collapse of a global rival. Leaders in
government and business in this country have been preoccupied with
chasing the world’s treasures for the benefit of the "indispensable
nation" and, as a result, abandoned the best interests of that
nation’s "indispensable citizens". That pursuit has guided the
American political system to centralize power, further remove states
and communities from the balance of powers, and drain American
resources for the very narrow purposes of a very narrow few.
Only a vigorous
and self-assured populace could have devoted itself to the work
demanded in the aftermath of a storm like Katrina. That populace,
however, has been demoralized with demands on its wages, devaluation
of its labor, and demeaned by expectations that its only worth comes
from what it can borrow so it can consume the produce of factories
in other countries. Clearly the current political and economic
culture did not produce the people who helped the "indispensable
nation" face down the "evil empire".
Comments and article submission.
Discuss this on our forum.
By Bob Strodtbeck
Columnist
Bob Strodtbeck has been writing editorial
commentaries since 1993. He has professional experiences in
pharmaceuticals, radio, and education. He has also served as a church
elder in an Orlando congregation where he has made his home since 1986.
rvstrodtbeck@peoplepc.com
Books about New Orleans
Keywords and misspellings: New Orleans
Orlenes Project for a new American Century Katrina Catrina |